Back to: Opinion
May 23, 2014
Follow Opinion

Letter: More wood should be able to enter green markets

Move away from LEED

Debbie Fromdahl’s recent column “LEED’s restrictions on “green” building could hurt Douglas County’s economy,” made points well-known to members of Oregon’s timber communities.

Limiting the types of wood that can enter green markets disproportionately harms heavily forested states, such as Oregon.

A growing amount of data quantifies the costs of limiting choice in certification markets. In addition to the EconoSTATS study that showed 31,000 job losses in Oregon from mandating the Forest Stewardship Council’s standards on our land, a previous report by the American Consumer Institute determined that imposing Forest Stewardship Council standards nationally would lead to $24 billion in losses in paper products markets and $10 billion for wood products.

Policies which recognize wood certified by the American Tree Farm System, Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative provide more outlets for our businesses through which they can sell their forest products. Many Oregon businesses that promote sustainability, such as JELD-WEN, support the Sustainable Forestry Initiative; there is no good reason for LEED not to do the same.

Some lawmakers have woken up on this issue. Gov. Kitzhaber has taken several executive actions that seek to improve markets for state timber. Moving away from endorsing LEED standards would be a great first step.

Bob Ragon

Executive director, Douglas Timber Operators


Stories you may be interested in

The News-Review Updated Jul 14, 2014 02:51PM Published May 23, 2014 12:13PM Copyright 2014 The News-Review. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.