It’s been difficult to understand why some in Douglas County think that there is a need to make changes in county government. I wanted to know why some people thought that this should be done.

Those for the proposed charter cited two reasons for their support. One reason was all of the county services that have either ended or that now require a user fee. The second reason was that these changes came about without the public having a voice in them.

Were these changes made by commissioners behind closed doors and with no public input?

Because of work on the Library Futures Task Force, I’ve become acquainted with the county budget, its reserves and its financial realities. The dire situation of our county’s funding directly relates to the complaints of those for the charter, and I’ve discovered that the changes made by commissioners are the direct outcome of lost timber revenues.

Because past commissioners had saved millions, we’ve had reserves that have brought us through to the current time. Now the reserves are running out, and the federal safety net has ended.

Looking at the budget presentation created by our current commissioners, it shows how they dealt with the realities of decreases in both the general and the road funds (http://bit.ly/2gYqt09).

The millions of dollars from Bureau of Land Management lands that flowed into the county budget are now coming in at a trickle. These funds and property taxes paid for our roads, schools, library system, fairgrounds, landfill, etc. Because income has been decreasing, the commissioners have been decreasing or ending the funding of many departments. Departments have adjusted to this loss by decreasing employees via attrition, getting grants, becoming a nonprofit, charging user fees, etc.

Douglas County has lost 80 percent of revenues in the General Fund and 90 percent in the Road Fund. In spite of such losses and by prioritizing what was funded, the commissioners have helped to fund Senior Services, Veterans Services, the Juvenile Department and the district attorney’s Mental Health Court, among other departments

Did the public have a voice in making these changes to county services?

Douglas County commissioners have three public meetings a week. Each commissioner is both a commissioner and an administrator, and each puts in about 65 hours a week. No decision can be made without a quorum of commissioners to vote during a public meeting.

Citizens can go into the commissioners’ office anytime or make an appointment to speak with any commissioner. Commissioners also return phone calls. In addition to their regular work, commissioners have had 75 speaking engagements about these changes. Speaking engagements always include a public forum during which anyone may ask questions.

Citizens who cannot attend meetings may listen live or by recording to work sessions or Wednesday meetings on the county’s website. Knowing what the commissioners are doing is no secret.

Would the proposed charter give the public more of a say in county matters?

After reading the charter, I discovered that there would be only two commissioners meetings per month. In addition, Douglas County would be divided into five separate districts with a commissioner for each. A citizen may appeal concerns only to his or her own commissioner.

All county business and administrative decisions would be made by one full-time paid county manager who would be accountable to part-time, unsalaried commissioners, not to citizens or to voters. The proposed charter in Chapter IV, Section 2, B states that “the County Manager shall be appointed for an indefinite term and may be removed at the pleasure of the board.” This administrator cannot be voted out no matter what citizens think.

In Chapter IV, Section 2, A5, the charter gives sole authority to the county manager to hire and fire all county employees. The commissioners will have no say in such decisions.

Currently, our sheriff is elected by citizens to carry out all county, state and federal laws. According to the charter in Chapter IV, Section 4, B1, the sheriff will carry out all such laws “except as determined otherwise by the Board.” Since the sheriff is elected by citizens to carry out laws, thus giving voters a true voice, why could the commissioners decide which laws the sheriff would enforce or not enforce? What about the voice of the voters?

If this charter passes, citizens would lose our voice and leadership on resource issues, especially those involving federal forest lands. Unsalaried, part-time commissioners could never take the place of full-time commissioners and speak up for our county in Congress. This lack of representation at the federal level would lead to even more economic instability in Douglas County.

Haven’t we lost enough? Are you willing to lose your voice in county government? Vote “no” on the charter.

Linda Middlekauff of Roseburg was a member of the Douglas County Library Futures Task Force and its Funding Subcommittee.

React to this story:


(5) comments


Great comments, well written.
They could hire some security, read:


The commissioners might have meetings open to the public but those meetings are held during normal working hours so the general public can't attend. That doesn't sound very inviting to me. They have also spent tax money on things like a study concerning putting a high dollar hotel in the urine district. Which if they had just asked for public opinion they could have used that money to do things like fix pot holes in our roads. Instead of offering alternatives to closing the library (like reduced hours) we were given an all or nothing choice. They have done a good job of giving perks to their timber buddies but at meetings they appear to be bored checking their phones, etc. instead of listening to tax paying citizens. We need some people that don't have outside jobs and can devote their time to listening and caring about this county. Right now Douglas County Oregon's dirty little joke.


Economic instability is chasing dwindling federal timber dollars when our hands our tied by the feds and then throwing county money to publish videos on salvage logging from wildfires. The current system has no term limits, excessive pay, access to county retirement plans, and three memebers who can be at large from the county. When we have no libraries but we’re pursing an OHV park you shouldn’t be surprised when the commissioners get blow back in the form of a charter. As for the sheriffs opinion... he blows through the budget as one of the largest consumers so naturally he’s not going to want to play politics with an administrator and 5 commissioners because that’s up from three people he has to schmooze.


Very well written!!!!

Facts don't lie

Very well written and extremely factual. Great work.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.