There is a group of people operating within our society, a religious subculture of sorts, who are willing to do whatever it takes to save this planet from the human race and the impacts of industrialization. To be worried about global warming is understandable, and to be alarmed with the degradation of the Earth’s oceans and its atmosphere is justifiable. But to what extent should those of us who are most concerned be able to force their will upon those of us who are least concerned — especially when you consider the benefits of industrialization that we all enjoy together? Must might once again become right?

With world populations exploding, a group of scientists, wealthy bankers and businessmen and political power-brokers have taken things into their own hands. They have formed a worldwide alliance by forging agreements between the nations. Central to this pseudo-altruistic ideology is a litany of concepts and actions that are designed to limit individual freedoms by condensing societies into urban population centers, inhibit and/or destroy potential resistance and relegate the control of natural resources to the alliance. Over time, huge areas of the Earth’s surface, including much of the American West (and the minerals beneath) will be set aside as “wildlife corridors,” to be controlled by this alliance for the greater good of the human race. To me, that seems a little extreme.

“Agenda 21” (Google it) is a United Nations agreement that establishes a course of action that the participating governments of the world are willing to pursue over the next 50 years and longer. It originated during Clinton’s administration and includes concepts such as sustainable growth and the preservation of bio-diversity. Social engineering is the precursor and in this country the liberal left is the agent of change.

Still confused about why they’re burning the Umpqua National Forest?

Todd Vaughn

Tiller

React to this story:

7
22
0
0
2

(8) comments

Sound8

oops, "one can safely" should read, "one can't safely".

Sound8

This statement always cracks me up, "especially when you consider the benefits of industrialization that we all enjoy together". Considering the fact that one can safely drink from most rivers and streams without heavily treating the water, in most towns and cities one can't even see the stars at night, cities so packed tight with people that they scurry around like cockroaches and you're bragging about the benefits of industrialization. It is true, we have many benefits that are positive, but the negatives are killing us yet you are waving the flag and hiding your head in the sand, sad.

mysteron

The News Review has sunk pretty low when it resorts to printing conspiracy theories masked as letters to the editor.

MasterofthePatriots

Wow tin foil hat snowflakes

MasterofthePatriots

Hahahaha let me get my tin foil hat

bohica13

ANYTHING coming out of the United Nations is bunk. We should have pulled out of that organization decades ago.

dst

Before you make up your mind Google "agenda 21 conspiracy theories" find out about the conspiracy mongers pushing their agenda and distorting the

CampConstitution

To learn more about Agenda 21, please watch this video by Debbie Bacigalupi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgIk1S2wp7A

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.