Bump Stock Maker Shutting Down

Shooting instructor Frankie McRae demonstrates the grip on an AR-15 rifle fitted with a “bump stock” at his 37 PSR Gun Club in Bunnlevel, North Carolina, on Oct. 4 in this AP file photo.

The Douglas County Board of Commissioners Wednesday voted unanimously to place a Second Amendment Preservation Ordinance on the ballot in November.

The move followed a public hearing where county residents gave a mixture of testimony for and against the measure. Supporters said county residents need to send a clear message to gun control advocates around the state about the gun rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Some urged the commissioners to go ahead and pass the ordinance, rather than waiting for a countywide vote.

Opponents said the ordinance would place the sheriff in legal jeopardy by forcing him to go against state and federal laws, and that gun regulations are necessary to protect children.

The ordinance that will go before voters in November affirms county residents’ right to bear arms, including semi-automatic weapons and high capacity feed systems. It also says residents can possess those firearms without registration requirements, and it gives the Douglas County sheriff the authority to determine what state, federal or local gun regulations are unconstitutional.

Bill Scheufele of Glide said the commissioners should go ahead with the ordinance, even though people would keep their Second Amendment rights whether or not it passed.

“Basically the ordinance that’s going through just confirms the inalienable right that we already have. Whether the ordinance gets voted in or out, we’re not going to lose that right. It’s set in concrete,” he said.

Fred Dayton, chairman of the Douglas County Republican Party, said supporters rallied in favor of the ordinance outside the Douglas County Courthouse Tuesday, and that he strongly favored the commissioners putting the issue before voters.

“We would like for you to adopt it, but we strongly encourage you to send it forward. We believe that it reflects the values of Douglas County,” he said.

Douglas County commissioner candidate Dan Loomis said he supports the ordinance because it will “send a clear message to the rest of the state” about the county’s stance on the Second Amendment, and about what he said are poorly conceived gun control measures like statewide Initiative Petitions 43 and 44.

Retired attorney Diana Wales called the ordinance “ill advised,” and said it is probably unconstitutional and barred by state statute. She said it would put the sheriff in legal jeopardy because the federal courts are traditionally hostile to local officials who ignore state or federal laws. She also said the county could face substantial financial liability if someone was injured or died due to the county refusing to enforce a state or federal gun law.

“A county ordinance can’t change the fact that determining the constitutionality of a law is a function of the courts, not the job of the sheriff,” Wales said.

Melanie MacKinnon of Roseburg said putting the ordinance on the ballot seemed like a waste of time and money, two things she said commissioners have been saying they are short on.

“I would respectfully like you to refocus your time, and our time, and limited resources on the primary operations of this county,” MacKinnon said.

Arlene Anderson of Glide said the ordinance should be rewritten to eliminate references to the Second Amendment. She said no one will vote against the Second Amendment, which she said is “part of the DNA of everyone in this room.” However, she said provisions in the ordinance that aren’t part of the Second Amendment are hiding behind the “smokescreen” of the Second Amendment language.

Retired pediatrician Larry Hall opposes the ordinance and favors background checks, gun safety courses, and laws that would keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers and people at extreme risk of harming others.

“Gun violence is a major public health crisis in this country. It’s a big deal. Over 30,000 people die every year from gun violence,” he said.

He said school shootings like the February massacre in Parkland, Florida are a “national shame.”

“Parkland breaks the heart of everybody with a heart,” he said.

Donice Smith argued through tears in a comment made following the vote, that gun rights could save kids’ lives. She said if some Umpqua Community College students had guns in their backpacks, the teacher and students who died during the Oct. 1, 2015 shooting there might still be alive today.

Commissioner Tim Freeman noted the commissioners have previously passed resolutions in support of the Second Amendment. He said the commissioners could simply approve an ordinance, but if they did, a later board could change it. However, he said if voters approve the ordinance, future commissioners could not change it.

Commissioner Chris Boice said he wants to see the merits of the ordinance debated, and that people have the right to express their opinion about it. He also said he doesn’t believe the ordinance asks the sheriff to decide solely by himself whether a law is constitutional.

Reporter Carisa Cegavske can be reached at 541-957-4213 or ccegavske@nrtoday.com.

React to this story:

4
2
1
1
5

Senior Reporter

Carisa Cegavske is the senior reporter for The News-Review. She can be reached at 541-957-4213 or by email at ccegavske@nrtoday.com. Follow her on Twitter @carisa_cegavske

(3) comments

S

Unanimous vote . . . you gotta love it! What that means is, "two half wits that don't make a wit," that comprise the Douglas County Board of Commissioners is leading the idiocy of this ordinance. Meanwhile just the week before we have this from the American Medical Association. A of a group of professionals with eight or more years of education who did more than just graduate from high school like the County's Commissioners: "With frustration mounting over lawmakers' inaction on gun control, the American Medical Association on Tuesday pressed for a ban on assault weapons and came out against arming teachers as a way to fight what it calls a public health crisis.
At its annual policymaking meeting, the nation's largest physicians group bowed to unprecedented demands from doctor-members to take a stronger stand on gun violence — a problem the organizations says is as menacing as a lethal infectious disease.
The action comes against a backdrop of recurrent school shootings, everyday street violence in the nation's inner cities, and rising U.S. suicide rates.
"We as physicians are the witnesses to the human toll of this disease," Dr. Megan Ranney, an emergency-medicine specialist at Brown University, said at the meeting.
AMA delegates voted to adopt several of nearly a dozen gun-related proposals presented by doctor groups that are part of the AMA's membership. They agreed to:
• Support any bans on the purchase or possession of guns and ammunition by people under 21.
• Back laws that would require licensing and safety courses for gun owners and registration of all firearms.
• Press for legislation that would allow relatives of suicidal people or those who have threatened imminent violence to seek court-ordered removal of guns from the home.
• Encourage better training for physicians in how to recognize patients at risk for suicide.
• Push to eliminate loopholes in laws preventing the purchase or possession of guns by people found guilty of domestic violence, including expanding such measures to cover convicted stalkers.
Many AMA members are gun owners or supporters, including a doctor from Montana who told delegates of learning to shoot at a firing range in the basement of her middle school as part of gym class. But support for banning assault weapons was overwhelming, with the measure adopted in a 446-99 vote.
"There's a place to start and this should be it," Dr. Jim Hinsdale, a San Jose, California, trauma surgeon, said before the vote.
Gun violence is not a new issue for the AMA; it has supported past efforts to ban assault weapons; declared gun violence a public health crisis; backed background checks, waiting periods and better funding for mental health services; and pressed for more research on gun violence prevention."

Rich

Mental health as a weapon against the people is communist in origin..

Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

Deceptive Transformation: The Truth of Soviet Influence in America and Gun Control...The idea of using mental health as a weapon against the people is communist in origin, and the social sciences, or the studying of human behavior has its roots in early twentieth century Russia when Ivan Pavlov developed his "classical conditioning" theories. In fact, Pavlov was disturbed that Vladimir Lenin would use these conditioning methods against the people in order to get them to accept communism.

Rich

There is no such thing as "gun violence". This is a focus-group-driven buzzword and talking point to create an imaginary bogeyman as the main anti 2nd Amendment propaganda tool. There are PEOPLE who commit violence with guns, but there are many more people who commit violence without them.
And, since the term "gun violence" is a catchword/cliche, the title suggests an unattainable goal. People have been robbing and killing other people, using the weapons of the day, since the beginning of man on this planet, which identifies the real issue - controlling criminal impulses in humans, not the otherwise legal instruments they use to commit crimes.
Anyone who doesn't realize and/or acknowledge this isn't thinking, s/he is 'feeling', and our liberty cannot depend upon what anybody 'feels'.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.