180613-nrr-transfer-01 (copy)

Ron Stottler of Winston throws refuse into the trash at the transfer station in Roseburg in 2015. The Douglas County Solid Waste Advisory Committee is considering closing some of the county’s stations in an effort to save money.

The Douglas County Solid Waste Advisory Committee will once again take up a controversial proposal to shutter seven of the county’s 11 solid waste transfer stations.

SWAC will meet in a work session at 3 p.m. Wednesday in Room 310 of the Douglas County Courthouse, 1036 SE Douglas Ave., Roseburg.

No public comment will be taken at the meeting, which is billed as a work session.

“While the public is welcome to come and respectfully listen, there will not be a public comment session,” said a news release about the meeting issued by the Douglas County Board of Commissioners office.

The SWAC advises the commissioners on solid waste issues. Any decision about the transfer stations would ultimately be made by the county commissioners, whose weekly Wednesday morning meetings are open for public comment.

At the most recent SWAC meeting in January, conflict erupted between former SWAC chairman Larry Spielbusch and Commissioner Chris Boice. Spielbusch had been removed from his position the morning of the meeting and asserted it was because he wanted public discussion of the commissioners’ decision to allow the Hanna family to dump their Windmill Inn demolition waste in the landfill for free.

The proposal SWAC will consider Wednesday would close all stations except those in Roseburg, Reedsport, Oakland and Myrtle Creek. Proponents said the changes are necessary to keep the solid waste system self-sufficient. Smaller stations in the more rural locations are expensive to operate.

Tiller station costs about $12.25 per trash bag dumped there, for example, compared with $4.51 per bag in Roseburg.

Other changes under consideration include keeping a fifth transfer station open at Glide, raising the landfill disposal rate, and altering charges at the transfer stations to match the actual operations costs. Over time, it’s likely that increased charges would lead residents to drive farther to the more cost-effective stations, or to sign up for trash hauling services from private companies.

Reporter Carisa Cegavske can be reached at 541-957-4213 or ccegavske@nrtoday.com.

React to this story:

1
0
1
2
13

Senior Reporter

Carisa Cegavske is the senior reporter for The News-Review. She can be reached at 541-957-4213 or by email at ccegavske@nrtoday.com. Follow her on Twitter @carisa_cegavske

(3) comments

Onelogload

What, you are expecting Glendale and Azalea residence to drive to Myrtle Creek to dump their garbage? Many folks will find it more cost effective to throw in Cow Creek and let the county pick up in Riddle. Much lower transportation expense for the county. My lord do you all live in Roseburg city limits?

DJ

it’s likely that increased charges would lead residents to drive farther to the ".........more cost-effective stations, or to sign up for trash hauling services from private companies."
There is one other option that is more likely to happen.
Trash will be dumped in the closest out of the way spot.

oregoncynic

That’s the standard technique of privatization: defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital. Then they get worse.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.