180715-nrr-Saftyday-01

Benjamin Martin, 10, of Phoenix, Arizona, exits a Douglas County Sheriff’s Office vehicle after speaking with deputy Kevin Webb during a Safety Day for Kids event in Roseburg in July.

Douglas County Commissioners didn’t make a Sept. 6 deadline to put the public safety levy on this November’s ballot because of timing, according to Douglas County Commissioner Tim Freeman.

“Literally it was just the timing of getting through all the steps,” Freeman said.

Douglas County Clerk Patricia Hitt said she didn’t know why the commissioners didn’t sign the final paperwork that would’ve put the levy on the ballot.

“All I know is that they did put it forward, they voted on it and put it forward. We advertised the ballot title which is what we had to do, but when it came time to actually give me the SEL 801 (form) with our signatures that says, ‘Yes, this goes on the ballot’ the timeline passed,” Hitt said.

The SEL 801 is a one-page document that requires a summary of the subject, purpose and effects of the ballot measure.

On Wednesday, Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin said he didn’t intend to have the levy on the ballot this year.

“I didn’t anticipate that by making that request that they were going to immediately say we’re going to put it on the November ballot,” Hanlin said.

In June, Hanlin wrote a letter to the commissioners requesting that a $2.38 per $1,000 public safety levy be put before voters, but didn’t push for a particular timeframe.

Freeman, who read Hanlin’s letter during an August commissioner meeting, said at the time voters needed to decide whether they wanted to pay the taxes necessary to maintain the minimum staffing level to continue providing 24/7 patrols around the county.

“I know how unfavorable tax increases are; however, I believe the most responsible course of action is to ask voters now if they want to retain our valued public safety services before we lose them, or if they’re willing to see them significantly reduced over the next couple of years,” Hanlin wrote in his letter.

Hanlin said Wednesday when he wrote the letter to the commissioners in June, it was with the mindset of starting the process this year so that by next year voters were informed about the issue come election time.

“My concern was that we didn’t have enough time to get information out to the voters and even before that do all the analysis and the legwork that we need to do,” Hanlin said.

Some of that legwork includes polling and determining whether or not to create a political action committee for the levy, according to Hanlin.

“I don’t want to just haphazardly throw a levy out there and expect people to pass it without a full understanding of what it’s going to fund,” Hanlin said.

Hanlin wasn’t at the August commissioner meeting, but Freeman said there was no time to wait.

“The sheriff was going to do this but he was unavailable today,” Freeman said during the August meeting. “We had talked about waiting until he came back to have this, but because of the timing for the election calendar there isn’t time for him to wait.”

During the meeting, Commissioner Chris Boice indicated that the county would know what voters thought in November.

“So this is the next step, the reasonable thing for us to do, I think, is to put this on the ballot and ask the voters their opinion and come Nov. 8 I think is the day we’ll know what that’s going to look like,” Boice said.

However, when Freeman made a motion to approve putting the levy on the ballot, he didn’t mention a date.

“It was pretty late that we brought that up,” Freeman said. “We just didn’t get all the pieces done in time.”

The levy, if passed, would have generated $16 million for sheriff’s services in the first year, allowing sheriff’s patrols and the jail to continue at current service levels.

Freeman said nothing has changed and that the issue will just be brought before voters at a later date.

But he said he’s not sure if that will be May.

Freeman said he’s hoping there will be a ruling soon on the Association of O&C Counties lawsuit challenging the Bureau of Land Management’s timber harvests. The lawsuit claims the timber harvests offered fall well below the logging levels promised by a federal law.

If the courts rule in favor of the O&C counties, Freeman said he would be able to tell voters that the public safety levy is only temporary until logging money starts to come back into the county’s coffers. Freeman noted that it could take up to six years.

Ultimately, Freeman said the decision on which election the levy will show up on is up to the board as a whole. The interim replacement will likely be chosen by Sept. 19 and serve until the end of the year.

“If the will of the board is to have it on the May ballot, that’s what it will be,” Freeman said.

Hanlin said he has talked to sheriffs in other counties who told him to give himself a year to prepare for a levy.

He said he was approached by people at the Douglas County Fair in August who were supportive of the levy and those who had concerns about a lack of information relative to how quickly the election was coming up.

“I will also say that was my concern before I was ever approached by anybody as well. I knew that August to November is just a very, very short time frame to get something as monumental as a public safety levy presented and supported in a county this size,” Hanlin said.

He also didn’t give a definitive answer about when he expects the levy to go on the ballot.

“I think if we really work hard we could maybe do it in May,” Hanlin said.

Saphara Harrell can be reached at 541-957-4216 or sharrell@nrtoday.com. Or on Twitter

@daisysaphara.

React to this story:

0
2
0
0
3

Crime and Natural Resources Reporter

Saphara Harrell is the crime and natural resources reporter for The News-Review. She previously worked at The World in Coos Bay. Follow her on Twitter @daisysaphara.

(5) comments

sectorstar

It sounds to me they "forgot" about this much how they seem to forget about other things. What about that audit that Freeman said was going to happen to review if there was any misappropriate use of money/funds once it came out that they stole (yes I will say stole because they used money for things that it was not intended for) over $9K of county safety net money to fund their lobby plane trips to D.C. Shortly after that Leif all the sudden is asking for money for his travel funds......which dumbfounded me and most of the county when a commissioner makes more in one year than the average person here will see or make in their life time probably.

john read

Soon it will be time to vote, and as they say all politics are local. They are supposed to work for us(We the people) and they are not worth a nickel of the money that they are paid. Have any of them earned the money that we all pay for the representation we pay for. We will not be late come November!!

Momos

Egos and incompetence. This is inexcusable. We're talking about providing basic law enforcement, and they won't even talk to each other.

Rise722

Way to go! Makes me want to vote for any of you in the future...

john read

Laziness is no excuse!!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.